
Back to index
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
Life Science Leader
Data Management and Information Technology—Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks?
Life Science Leader
Advancing Sponsor/CRO Collaborations to Improve Preclinical Throughput
Life Science Leader
Not A Popularity Contest
PharmPro
Outsourcing Clinical Research: Established vs. Emerging Markets
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
Pharma iQ
Overcoming Barriers to Forming Successful Relationships with CMOs in Emerging Markets
PharmPro
Who should be doing your Pharmaceutical Analytical Testing – a CRO or CMO?
Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
Rating Pharma Contract Manufacturers: Does Perception Equal Reality?
BioSpace
Nice Insight Announces Publication of Its Q4 CRO/CMO Quarterly Intelligence Report
November 2011
October 2011
Life Science Leader
Will A Focus On Innovation Pay Off For Custom Synthesis Providers?
FiercePharma Manufacturing
Top 10 Standout CMOs
BioPharm International
Contract Services Spending: Who's Spending What, and Where?
Pharmaceutical Outsouring
How Relevant are 483s in Terms of Compliance Perception?
SFGate, PRWeb
Therapure Biopharma Inc. wins The CMO Leadership Award
Life Science Leader
Social Media Leads To Editorial – And More
PharmPro
Sterile Manufacturing Oppportunities
Life Science Leader — CMO Leadership Awards supplement issue
It’s About the Customer
PharmaChem
Where do strategic business opportunities lie for mid-tier CROs?
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
NI Company News
NI Published Articles
NI Calendar of Events
NI Media Partners
Contact Us
September 16-20 Boston, MA
|
|
|
Life Science Leader
May 2011
Written By
Victor Coker Director of Business Intelligence Nice Insight ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If you have been in the pharmaceutical industry for an extended period of time, you’ve likely noticed how CROs have evolved from offering basic support to providing a wide range of clinical, central laboratory, and analytical services to meet market demands. Currently, the trend is for smaller CROs (as defined by revenue market share) to consolidate. Coupled with acquisitions, the organizations relied upon for independent development services are expanding and adding new services. As a result, the market is flooded with CROs that perform the same early-stage services, making it difficult for pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to find the ideal candidates for their particular projects.
Many management teams within these CROs have played into the traditional method of selection and simply focused on pricing structure as their primary means of attracting business. Cost is certainly a high priority when selecting the right CRO, particularly amidst the current constrictive economic conditions, but what happens if price is no longer a differentiator? To investigate the efficacy of selecting a CRO partner based on price, Nice Insight reviewed the brand index data from our recently released Contract Research and Manufacturing (CRAM) report. First, we identified the top ten CROs of which our survey respondents (executives, innovators, and decision makers in pharmaceuticals and biotechnology) were most familiar — meaning respondents indicated they knew the companies well and/or had worked with them in the past. The results, in no particular order, were as follows: ICON (Prevalere Life Science), Lancaster Laboratories, Inc., Millipore Corp., Huntingdon Life Sciences, Nanosyn, Boston Analytical, Inc., Covance, EMD Chemicals (EMD & Millipore merged), West Pharmaceutical Services, and Capsugel. It’s More Than Just Cost Structure As suspected, we found the top 10 companies rated very similarly on the perception of pricing; however, this similarity was not reflected in brand awareness scores. For example, Lancaster Laboratories and Capsugel aligned closely in pricing, rating 5.5 and 5.8 out of 10, respectively. However, in terms of awareness, 42% of respondents indicated they were familiar with Lancaster Laboratories, whereas only 20% indicated the same of Capsugel. So, while pricing is a factor, cost structure alone is not a clear indicator of the best-matched CRO for a project. The results of the Nice Insight Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Survey revealed that pricing actually rated fourth out of the six main attributes considered by decision makers when selecting outsourcing partners. The attributes, in ranked order of importance were: quality, reliability, regulatory compliance, pricing, productivity, and accessibility. |
|
|
|
No Single Factor = Success After taking a deeper look into the results regarding how these attributes relate to partnering opportunities, it was clear that no single factor had the ability to drive success; rather, communicating differentiated value to the appropriate target audience in order to gain awareness was key. What was shocking from these findings was that 85% of the 400 CRAM companies in the study scored lower than 40% on brand awareness. Meaning, the vast majority of survey respondents did not even recognize the company names or logos. Low awareness magnifies the difficulty of finding the right partner on both sides of the outsourcing relationship. As a CRO, it is impossible to receive business from companies who do not know you exist, regardless of your service offering or track record. As a pharmaceutical or biotechnology company seeking a new partner, the awareness gap may mean the CROs with the highest peer ratings are completely unknown to your organization. After all, the companies regarded as highly visible to some are completely unfamiliar to most. To make the contracting selection process faster and more efficient, the Nice Insight CMO/CRO database has built-in filters that enable pharmaceutical and biotechnology users to search for partners within service sectors by region, market, and market sector. Once the companies are identified, the user can create a short list and rank companies according to their customer perception scores — which will further indicate whether attributes like quality and reliability were highly regarded by their previous partners. |
|





















